The 2013 Emmy Awards Red Carpet Review

The word that immediately comes to mind as I think over the fashions I saw at the Emmy Awards last night is “divided.” Many of the gowns had a part that I loved but a part that I hated; or I loved it but my husband hated it; or the online reviews are split between loving and hating a gown; or I simply was torn between loving and hating a particular gown, for whatever reason. Here are some examples of the worst offenders (or are they the best? I’m still not sure).

Good Style, Bad Color

There were a number of gowns that had lovely cuts and silhouettes, but the color just did not work on the wearer. Anna Faris wore a vivid yellow gown that was a gorgeous color, but it clashed with her skin tone, making her look both sallow and pale, especially in combination with her platinum hair. I loved the full skirt, the not-too-high slit, the beautifully wrapped bodice, and the adorable lizard brooch at the back, but the color completely ruined the effect. At the opposite end of the spectrum was January Jones in a beige dress that vanished into her skin. I loved the pleated lace skirt with the solid panel at the hem and the severely structured yet flattering bodice, but the overall look was too washed out.

Top vs. Bottom

A number of gowns seemed to be suffering from identity crises, with tops and bottoms that seemed to belong to different dresses. Michele Dockery was a prime example: her red halter with giant loops at the back would have been lovely with a different color and cut of skirt, and her burgundy skirt with flat pleats in front and fuller pleats in back had interesting details like an asymmetrical hem and faux bustle construction, but it just didn’t work with the top. Likewise, Kate Mara’s white column skirt with a high slit was lovely and flattering (I even liked the pockets. Really!), but it was not in the same style as her bohemian crocheted top. It actually might have worked without the side-boobage, but as it was, it was too much of a mish-mash of slouchy and structured.

A few others had tops and bottoms that went together, but one part or the other just didn’t flatter the wearer. Amy Poehler’s trumpet skirt was a lovely silhouette for her, and I adored the charming Chinese dragons at the hips, with their tiny red tongues and fluffy feather details, but the top had oddly scooped cap sleeves and a matronly gathered collar that called for a more revealing skirt to balance it. Claire Danes, on the other hand, also had a lovely and flattering full skirt on her lace gown, but her top was a bit too revealing, appearing to be sliding down her body and successfully disguising any voluptuousness she may have. (In the interest of fairness, the open back was gorgeous even though it was also very revealing.)

One Little Detail

And then there were the gowns that would have been fabulous if the designer had left out one small detail. In the case of Kaley Cuoco, the sheer panel across her ribcage made her look very short-waisted and stumpy, whereas if the swath of color had continued evenly down her torso this would have been one of my favorite looks of the night. Julianne Hough nearly pulled off her very daring gown, and also would have been a knockout if she had opted for a short skirt under her transparent gown rather than what appears to be a pair of granny panties. Heidi Klum made a rare misstep with just a bit too much heavy-looking fabric at the neck, making her look top-heavy and disproportionate. And I could have forgiven poor Zosia Mamet’s stylist for leaving her beautiful watercolor gown hemmed to the wrong length if it hadn’t been ruined by the addition of a bizarre white bib and black pleather…what? Breastplate? Boob swath? Mini-kini? I don’t know what to call it, but I hope I never see one again. Ever.

Split Decision

There were a few gowns that those watching with me (in other words, my husband) and I disagreed on, and several that the online reviewers also disagreed on. Julie Bowen’s gown was a lovely color against her sun-kissed skin and hair, and the draping of the bodice and the fullness at the hem created a lovely silhouette, but to some eyes it looked very bottom-heavy and unwieldy. I adored Connie Britton’s teal velvet with metallic gold embroidery, but my husband thought the bodice looked unsupported and in danger of sliding out of place. Julia Louis-Dreyfus wore a shiny silver column that looked like thousands of sparkly mirrors at some angles but like bad 1960s crochet in others, and she could really have used a pop of color in a piece of jewelry or a handbag or some lip color to avoid looking washed out. And Christina Hendricks, whose figure I envy (although a figure that voluptuous has to be a nightmare to dress), looked both curvy and contained in her black dress, but somehow managed to also look a bit matronly and overly covered up. I’m still torn on whether I love or hate all four of these looks.

Clear Winners

There were quite a few gowns that hit it right on the money, though. My favorites of the night included both of the Deschanel sisters, who were charmingly color-coordinated yet each in her own unique style. More subdued Emily wore her hair in a classic updo with an elegant one-shouldered grey-blue lace column; bubblier Zooey wore her hair in soft waves with a simple ice-blue satin sheath with a deep keyhole and a high slit. Tiny Fey chose a simple trumpet-style wide-necked halter in striking cobalt that highlighted her gorgeous figure. Sarah Hyland’s deep emerald gown was covered with a layer of transparent black lace, which also served to fill in the plummeting neckline and add a hint of sweet demureness, and was gathered beautifully into a wide black satin belt. Alison Hannigan and my perennial favorite Carrie Underwood both wore deep purple gowns with similarly draped sweetheart necklines and even wore their hair in similarly sideswept loose waves, but Hannigan’s shiny satin gown was tightly fitted to the thigh then flared into a mermaid style, where Underwood’s skirt was a more traditional ballgown, wrapping its fullness into a black belt. And Sofia Vergara’s vivid red, tightly fitted to the knee, mock peplum, lace-covered gown was the most stunning look of the night, eliciting the words, “Va-va-va-voom!!!” from this reviewer.

Clear Losers

Of course, no red carpet critique would be complete without listing a few losers. By far, the two worst looks of the evening go to Robin Wright and Lena Dunham, who – sadly – are both actresses that I love, but who make frequent fashion missteps. Wright hides her lovely figure in a dull, black, high-necked, cap-sleeved column that, combined with her pale makeup and slightly sad expression, make her look like she’s on her way home from a rather formal funeral. And Lena Dunham, please fire your stylist for putting your lovely self in this awful gown. The fabric looks like a couch that’s been in a church basement since 1973, and the flat fullness of the skirt front adds 80 pounds to her figure. I actually love the cut of the bodice, especially the back with the open panel below the tie and the lovely framing of her tattoo (I’m not a big tattoo fan, but if you have them, make your clothes work with them, not against them). But the overall look is just unforgiveable. 

Fortunately, the winners far exceed the losers, and even the losers aren't as bad as they've been some years. At least this year no one was wearing this:

The 2013 Academy Awards

This will be primarily a fashion blog, I promise, but I’d just like to throw out a few comments on the ceremony itself before I get to the couture critique. First of all, I was somewhat disappointed when it was announced that Seth MacFarlane would be hosting, but I was pleasantly surprised at how he did. The host of an awards show should be, in my opinion, like an opening act: Get the audience excited and enthusiastic and in a good mood, then get out of the way and let the show go on. And that’s just what he did. His opening number, “We Saw Your Boobs,” managed to be hysterically funny without being in bad taste, and the reactions of the various stars mentioned were priceless and nicely captured by the cameramen and editors. The appearance by William Shatner was funny and timely, if a bit long. And the dance bit with Charlize Theron and Channing Tatum was terrific and just the right length. Then once the award presentations started, MacFarlane made himself relatively scarce, appearing only often enough to inject a funny remark and keep the show moving along. I could have lived without the closing number with Kristin Chenoweth that basically called 99% of the audience “losers,” but on the whole he did a more than passable job and I wouldn’t be upset if the Powers That Be asked him back next year.

Another brief comment about the ceremony: As much as I love musical theater, and as terrific as all the production numbers were, this is the Oscars, not the Tonys. The Les Miz number was appropriate, Barbara Streisand’s number was a lovely tribute to the late Marvin Hamlisch, and Adele singing “Skyfall” was wonderful. But the reprise of “All That Jazz” felt a bit shoehorned in and as much as I adore Shirley Bassey, her number felt a bit extraneous as well. I understand they were going with the theme of “Music in Movies,” but much like a wedding, where the only theme should be “This is a Wedding,” the only theme the Oscars need is “This is the Oscars.”

And now that I have that business out of the way, on to the fashion awards! I went with a few different categories this year.

The “Channeling Audrey Hepburn” Award

The Nominees: Salma Hayek, Anne Hathaway

 

Hayek’s simple column topped with an ornate gold halter and sweeping updo trimmed with a matching gold tiara was shades of Hepburn in “My Fair Lady,” complete with regal bearing and perfect posture.

 

Hathaway’s slender figure and huge dark eyes, particularly when highlighted by her recent short pixie ‘do, make her a prime candidate for classic Hepburn style. Her pale, simply cut column was evocative of the dress Hepburn wore as a presenter at the 1955 Academy Awards. Although I suspect the back of Hepburn’s gown was a bit more conservative than Hathaway’s self-described “party in the back,” plunging, artfully-strapped posterior view.

Winner: Hathaway, for combing old Hollywood glamour with 21^st century chic.

 

The “Over-50 and Fabulous” Award

The Nominees: Sally Field, Jane Fonda, Barbra Streisand

  

Field glowed in her bright red, demure yet elegant gown. She had a definite air of being a very classy mom, a feeling highlighted by her charming red-carpet story of tying Joseph Gordon-Levitt’s bow tie in the limo on the way to the ceremony. Fonda stunned in a bright yellow gown with plunging neckline, back cutout, and impossibly shiny metallic accents at the waist emphasizing how tiny it still is. All those years of aerobics are paying off in spades. Streisand’s sweeping black gown with gold accents and wide, deep neckline was elegant and age-appropriate, if a bit voluminous. The combination of a wide black choker with a handful of long gold necklaces was just the right finishing touch.

Winner: Fonda, for making all of us under-50s want to go dust off our 1980s exercise videos.

The “Oscar Look-Alike” Award

The Nominees: Renee Zellweger, Catherine Zeta-Jones, Nicole Kidman

Zellweger’s unadorned lamé column echoed both the color and the silhouette of the Oscar statue. She could have used a bit more polish – perhaps a pair of chandelier earrings or bright scarlet lips (was she even wearing makeup at all?). Zeta-Jones wore an even shinier metallic gold gown that clung to her figure down to mid-thigh, where it flared into a chiffon train with metallic curlicues that beautifully echoed the soft waves and shine of her hair. Kidman’s shiny black gown bore similar gold curlicues on the flared skirt, gold detailing at the neckline, and a gold belt buckle. Sadly, her limp locks did not quite echo the detailing on her gown.

Winner: Zeta-Jones, for making Oscar himself envious.

 

The “Less Is More” Award

The Nominees: Jennifer Garner, Jessica Chastain, Reese Witherspoon

Coco Chanel was famous for saying that after a woman got dressed, she should take off one thing. Garner took her advice to heart in a simple plum column with a long ruffled train as its only detail, and a magnificent diamond necklace set off by her softly knotted updo. Chastain let her fitted column speak for itself, its only adornments being its muted beading and a tiny diamond bracelet. And Witherspoon let her gorgeous blue eyes be her perfectly coordinated accessory in a stunning cobalt blue gown with black accents at the neckline and waist and a small train.

Winner: Garner, for the perfect accessories, including her adoring look at husband Ben Affleck as he accepted his Academy Award.

 

The “Haven’t We Seen That Dress Before?” Award

The Nominees: Jennifer Aniston, Charlize Theron

 

Shame on both Aniston’s and Theron’s stylists for dressing them in gowns so similar to gowns worn by other prominent actresses earlier this awards season. Aniston’s strapless, flared scarlet ball gown lacked only a black belt in making it a dead ringer for Jennifer Lawrence’s Golden Globes gown. And Theron’s white gown added a notch in the bodice and a short train, but otherwise echoed exactly the style and silhouette of Anne Hathaway’s Golden Globes gown, right down to the unflattering stiff peplum.

Winner: There’s no winner where fashion repeats are concerned.

The “Erte Is In” Award

The Nominees: Stacey Keibler, Halle Berry, Naomi Watts

Art Deco seemed to be one of the fashion themes of the evening. Keibler and Berry both wore belted, geometric black and gold patterned columns, Keibler’s with a halter top and Berry’s with squared-off shoulders and a plunging neckline, while Watts opted for a silver sheath with an oddly asymmetrical cut-out at the shoulder.

Winner: Keibler by a hair over Berry, whose gown was just a bit too reminiscent of the Chrysler Building.

 

The “Non-Celebrity” Award

The Nominees: Kelly Osbourne, Robin Roberts, Corinne Bishop

 

Among the actual celebrities, there are always a few interviewers, significant others, and assorted hangers-on whose style is worthy of mention. Osbourne’s sparkly black gown featured solid bands across the bodice, multiple diagonal straps at the neckline and a beautifully full skirt. Roberts’ slender figure and closely cropped hair reminded us of her recent bout with cancer, but her stunning cobalt blue velvet gown with twisted halter and short train was as gorgeous as her triumphant smile. Bishop’s teal gown had lovely woven accents over the bodice and was elegant and eye-catching without overshadowing her escort, Jamie Foxx, who was looking quite elegant and eye-catching himself in an impeccably fitted steel-grey tux with black lapels, shirt, and bow tie.

Winner: Roberts, because good health and happiness are the best accessories of all.

 

The “Tiny But Tasteful” Award

The Nominees: Kristin Chenoweth, Giuliana Rancic, Jacki Weaver

With the emphasis on slender builds so prevalent in Hollywood, it’s a common fashion misstep for a celebrity to choose a dress that overwhelms her. Chenoweth, at a mere 4’11”, has been guilty of overdressing in the past, but she hit just the right notes in her black-and-white ball gown. The detailing highlighting the bodice and the skirt fitted to the hips balances the fullness of the skirt, and her tall updo gave her those all-important few extra inches. Rancic, at 5’9”, would never be called petite, but her exceptional slightness has led her to drown in her gown on more than one occasion. She found her mark here in a black gown with broad bands wrapping around the skirt and just a hint of ruffle at the neckline and hem. Weaver, 5’2” and a bit thick-waisted, wore a cranberry-colored gown with a high waist, mermaid skirt, and paisley-patterned bodice. Although the gown itself was lovely, the high waist made her look stumpy and disproportionate, a common pitfall for women with short torsos. It’s nice to make your legs look long, but not at the expense of the rest of your figure.

Winner: Chenoweth, because anyone under 5 feet tall who can pull off a ball gown that well deserves an award.

 

The “Pale Is Pretty” Award:

The Nominees: Jennifer Lawrence, Amanda Seyfried, Zoe Saldana

 

Lawrence’s voluminous ball gown was stunning on the red carpet, but also caused the Stumble Heard ‘Round the World as she fell up the steps on the way to accept her Best Actress Oscar. Her simple long crystal necklace worn backwards, softly waved updo, and tiny metallic clutch were perfect accessories. Seyfried’s pale lavender, beaded halter dress featured a keyhole cutout and a sweeping train. Saldana’s white dress had fluffy flowers at the top and successively darkening chiffon layers peeping out from the hem.

Winner: Lawrence, because even with her stumble, she looked effortlessly elegant.

 

The “Just Say No” Awards

The Losers (because it’s a shame just to be nominated): Bradley Cooper’s mom, Brandi Glanville, Lianne Spiderbaby

There are always a few fashion don’ts at every awards show, and the 2013 Oscars were no exception. Bradley Cooper’s mom committed multiple fashion sins, with her fluffy marabou shrug and bunchy waistline, but the topper was the horrible metallic silver tennis shoes. Sensible flats I can understand, but this is the Academy Awards. Footwear in the sneaker family is always a no-no, even if you’re Helena Bonham Carter. I don’t even know where to begin with Glanville’s gown. Actually, I do. That bodice was 6 inches too low and 6 inches too small. Don’t try to put 10 pounds of sugar into a 5-pound bag, honey. And Spiderbaby’s gown might have worked on a Halle Berry or a Nicole Kidman, but as lovely as Spiderbaby is, she just doesn’t have the tiny waist and voluptuous figure to pull off such a deeply plunging neckline.

 

I also have a few Special Mention awards for actresses whose gowns deserve to be recognized, but who fell into categories all their own.

The “Under 10” Award: Quevenzhané Wallis

The pint-sized star looked both glamorous and age-appropriate in a cobalt blue party dress with matching wrap, accessorized with a lovely updo, matching diamond earrings and headband, and a puppy purse which is wearing a gown and tiara of its own. Petite perfection!

 

The “Big Is Beautiful” Award: Octavia Spencer

Hollywood stylists often stumble when dressing larger women (see: Melissa McCarthy), and Spencer has been guilty of poor fashion choices on occasion. But she was right on the money in this lovely pale peach, off-the-shoulder, tulle-covered gown that showed off her gorgeous curves and coloring.

 

The “Maternity Chic” Award: Jenna Dewan-Tatum

I can’t imagine it’s easy to find a flattering and comfortable maternity gown that’s Oscar-worthy, but Dewar-Tatum got it right in this snug but not too tight black lace sheath. Her lovely pregnancy glow and Channing Tatum on her arm didn’t hurt her overall look, either.

The “Offbeat Is Awesome” Award: Olivia Munn

I adored Munn’s sari-inspired gown. The color was stunning, the lines of the skirt draping at her hips were fascinating, the gold detailing on the bodice was just the right touch of bling, and the long narrow train made it look like a gown and not just a costume. And the perfectly-coordinated crimson lips and sleek, shiny hair were the icing on the glamour cake.

 

All things considered, this was a good year for Oscar fashions. There were lots of lovely, flattering dresses and no big mistakes among the big stars. I like the trends of less jewelry and paler colors, and I love that there is such a variety of silhouettes, from full ball gowns to trumpet styles to columns, and such a variety of fabrics from metallic to satin to chiffon.

Well done, Hollywood. Well done.